British Lit, English/ELA, Teacher Resources

The FrankenTest

I sat down one day last spring with my annotated copy of Frankenstein, and EIGHT short HOURS later—voila! A FrankenTest was born created written. Human-written. By me. An actual human person.

On the last episode of Creating Resources with Always Learning HQ, I was playing with AI as a shortcut for writing media-bias practice passages. I needed something less triggering than real-life politics, sports, entertainment, or news for my students to get some reps identifying rhetorical elements in news writing. Don’t worry. Later, there was a major assessment involving real-life news articles. We just needed a little guided practice with some actual fake news before wandering into the wilderness of the current media landscape.

But for the FrankenTest, I went hardcore old school: just me in my office with a scandalous amount of coffee, a bag of Hershey’s Kisses, my teaching copy of the novel, a laptop, and my brain. At the end of the literal day, I was exhausted, but the product was totally worth it.

When my seniors took the test, the grades were everything I’d hoped. Students who read and annotated the novel scored in the high 90s. Students who studied summaries or practiced using AI chats scored from the mid 50s to low 70s.  

You see, at their core, English literature tests are reading tests. Of course, it helps to read the actual book, but many students can get the objective elements (and some analysis) from online sources. And what they don’t learn on summary sites or through AI, they pick up on as they tune in to class discussions. 

What they can’t do without actually reading the novel is adapt their brains to the writing style. That’s what makes this unit test a challenge. Obviously, Mary Shelley did not write the test. I did, with my coffee and Hershey’s Kisses. But some of Shelley’s language patterns and diction echo through the assessment. So students who read or listened to the novel did well, and students who also annotated did GREAT.

I’m excited for you to see this resource. Normally, you’d scroll to the bottom of the post to download a PDF of the resource. Not this time, though, and that kind of hurts my heart because I really love sharing free teacher resources.

For the sake of test security, the FrankenTest lives behind a paywall on Teachers Pay Teachers (answer key and essay rubric included). If you’re interested, there’s a decent preview on the listing.

More free stuff for classroom activities is coming soon to AlwaysLearningHQ.com. So keep checking back from time to time. I’m cleaning out the proverbial attic of resources from across four decades of teaching and putting each in one of four bins: keep, trash, donate, and sell.

It’ll be fun to see what lands here next. Hopefully, it won’t be a monster!

English/ELA, Faith-Based Resources, Free Resources, Teacher Resources

Frankenstein, Ian Malcolm, & Emerging Technology

Did y’all know that a new Frankenstein movie comes out in November?!

It’s releasing on Netflix and looks like it’ll be pretty intense with Guillermo del Toro at the helm of the adaptation.

Coincidentally, when I stepped back into a British Lit classroom to land the plane for the 2024–2025 school year, the final work the seniors studied was Frankenstein.

I teach in a private Christian school, so there are all kinds of lessons about the dangers of playing God that rise to the surface quickly. This work is too perfect to let it go gently into the good night of high school. So, with the goal of making the 19th-century novel relevant to today’s headline-grabbing technologies, I took a gamble.

Instead of launching Frankenstein with the Emerging Technology project as an introductory activity— or saving it for the final assessment—I paused the reading right after Victor runs screaming into the streets when his creature pops in to say “Hi, Dad!” on Creation Day.

We traced Victor’s journey from curiosity to passion, then obsession to possession, and when the consequences of his pride first peeked into the novel on that dark and stormy night, we hit pause.

At the heart of the project is Ian Malcolm’s legendary quote to Dr. Hammond about the hubris of scientific achievement without ethical consideration. That quote inspired the project’s name. (If you haven’t seen the original Jurassic Park movie in a while, take a minute to watch this clip.)

It was a very quick project, two block-schedule days total. We reviewed the presentation, chose groups, researched topics, and presented findings to the class. And oh my word, did those technologies spark some fabulous debates!

Below are PDFs of the resources we used. Students documented their group discussion and research on the worksheets. I counted the worksheets as classwork and the presentations as major assessments.

Please note: The project’s intent was to examine emerging technologies in light of traditional biblical wisdom—to factor in the should along with the could. If that’s not your worldview, you may or may not find this resource helpful.

But if it is, I can’t wait to hear how it goes!

The post photo above is the first slide of the project’s instructional presentation, which uses a template designed by Hope Studio via Canva.